Game #29 1985 vs 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on May 1, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 29
  • ’85 Record: 11-18 .379
  • ’08 Record: 13-16 .448

There are five other teams that had a 13-16 records 29 games into the season.

  • 1977 finished with a record of 75-87 and placed fourth in the division.
  • 1979 finished with a record of 71-91 and placed fourth in the division.
  • 1982 finished with a record of 87-75 and placed third in the division.
  • 1983 finished with a record of 79-83 and placed fifth in the division.

Game #28: 1985 vs 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on April 30, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 28
  • ’85 Record: 11-17 .393
  • ’08 Record: 12-16 .429

The ’08 Giants remain one game above the ’85 team. There were three other teams 28 games into
the season that had the same record as the ’08 team. They are 1977 who finished fourth; the ’81
team also finished fourth; and the ’04 team who finished 2nd.

Overall it wasn’t a good sports day for the Bay Area. The Sharks lose their most important game of the season to the Stars, the A’s lose and the Giants blow the game.

Game #27: 1985 vs 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on April 29, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 27
  • ’85 record: 11-16 .407
  • ’08 record: 12-15 .444

There were five other teams that had the 12-15 record 27 games into the season.

  • The same three teams from game 26 were at 12-15 at this point in their seasons so I won’t go into their details here.
  • The ’82 team finished third in the division with a record of 87-75 ( .537 ).
  • The ’04 team finished second with a record of 91-71 ( .562 ).

It was nice to actually watch part of a Giants game (I have Extra Innings package while NHL Center Ice is still on) last night. The Giants looked pretty good from what I saw. Cain’s WHIP (1.69) was a little high but it was nice for him to get a win.

Another nice bit of news was the fact that it was announced that Zito will be put in the bullpen to figure out his issues. I hope he can get it straightened out, it would do nothing but help beef up the
Giants pitching.

Game #26 1985 vs. 2008

Posted in Players, Sabean, Team Comparison, Zito with tags , , on April 28, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 26
  • ’85 record: 10-16 .385
  • ’08 record: 11-15 .423

There were three other teams that had the 11-16 record 26 games into the season.

  • The 1977 team finished fourth in the division with a 75-87 (.463 ) record.
  • The strike shortened 1981 season was ended with the giants finishing fourth again with a 56-55 (.505). This was the only team to finish above .500 when it was 11-16 at this point in the season.
  • The 1983 team finished with a 79-83 (.488 ) record and finished fifth in the division.

ZITO! ZITO! ZITO! (say it in the same vein as MARSHA! MARSHA! MARSHA! from the Brady bunch). With a WHIP for the game of 3.33 (1.99 for the season) and a unending parade of runs for what seems like the 85th start of his SF career I think we can officially pronounce his signing a flop.
I think it is time to quit wasting games by having Zito start. You can feel the difference in the team behind Zito vs. the younger pitchers. While we are at it why not get rid of the GM also? I just heard on XM radio’s Home Plate that Sabean had put a 5 year 80 million dollar (I believe that was the amount offered) to Andruw Jones. Thanfully Jones declined. It is time for a more ‘current’ GM to take over. Look across the bay and see what the A’s do and follow their lead!

This just in
I just saw this on the game wrap up from MLB.com

Bochy called his pitcher into his office after the game to notify him that he may be sent to the bullpen or have his next start skipped.

“We can’t keep doing what we are doing. We need to get together and get a game plan on what we think is best,” Bochy said. “I’m sure there’s a lot on his mind. He’s got a lot of pride and he’s taking this harder than anybody.”

At least we may be saved from an instant loss when Zito’s turn comes up again.

Giants Shortstop History and Johnnie LeMaster

Posted in Players with tags , , on April 25, 2008 by statsdriven

The current SS situation in San Francisco reminds me of my childhood and one SS in particular, Johnnie LeMaster. I wondered if he was really as bad as I thought he was back when I was a preteen. So I did a little research. I went back and looked for Giant SS that played 90% of their games as a Giant at shortstop and played at least 200 games at the position as a Giant.

Most Games at SS
Player G pct at SS Seasons
Fletcher, Art 1240 0.945 1909-1920
Uribe, Jose 969 0.999 1985-1992
Aurilia, Rich 960 0.907 1995-2003, 2007
LeMaster, Johnnie 954 0.996 1975-1985
Dark, Alvin 887 0.945 1950-1956
Kerr, Buddy 820 0.979 1943-1949
Pagan, Jose 613 0.945 1959-1965
Dahlen, Bill 578 0.998 1904-1907
Bancroft, Dave 521 0.979 1920-1923, 1930-1930
Bridwell, Al 509 1.000 1908-1911
Fuller, Shorty 504 0.990 1892-1896
Clayton, Royce 499 0.998 1991-1995
Vizquel, Omar 445 1.000 2005-2007
Glasscock, Jack 221 1.000 1890-1891

LeMaster comes in as #4 in the most games at SS as a Giant. I was a little surprised to see that he was that high on the list but it makes sense. When I think about it, it seems like he was the SS for my entire childhood. The next thing I did was to rank the players by BA, SLG, OBP, and RC27. So here are the rankings.

Best BA at SS
Player G AB H BA
Bancroft, Dave 521 2160 670 0.310
Glasscock, Jack 221 881 261 0.296
Dark, Alvin 887 3794 1106 0.292
Bridwell, Al 509 1698 480 0.283
Aurilia, Rich 960 3927 1085 0.276
Fletcher, Art 1240 4766 1311 0.275
Vizquel, Omar 445 1660 451 0.272
Kerr, Buddy 820 2952 756 0.256
Clayton, Royce 499 1790 445 0.249
Pagan, Jose 613 2042 494 0.242
Uribe, Jose 969 2992 721 0.241
Dahlen, Bill 578 1978 475 0.240
Fuller, Shorty 504 1880 446 0.237
LeMaster, Johnnie 954 3089 695 0.225

Not surprisingly, Lemaster is at the bottom of the BA list. Up next, slugging comparison.

Best SLG at SS
Player G AB H SLG
Dark, Alvin 887 3794 1106 0.439
Aurilia, Rich 960 3927 1085 0.438
Bancroft, Dave 521 2160 670 0.413
Glasscock, Jack 221 881 261 0.384
Fletcher, Art 1240 4766 1311 0.356
Vizquel, Omar 445 1660 451 0.353
Clayton, Royce 499 1790 445 0.339
Kerr, Buddy 820 2952 756 0.337
Bridwell, Al 509 1698 480 0.329
Uribe, Jose 969 2992 721 0.316
Pagan, Jose 613 2042 494 0.315
Dahlen, Bill 578 1978 475 0.308
LeMaster, Johnnie 954 3089 695 0.293
Fuller, Shorty 504 1880 446 0.289

Again, Lemaster is at the wrong end of the list. This time he’s 2nd worst.

Best OBP at SS
Player G AB H OBP
Bancroft, Dave 521 2160 670 0.382
Bridwell, Al 509 1698 480 0.372
Glasscock, Jack 221 881 261 0.362
Vizquel, Omar 445 1660 451 0.337
Dark, Alvin 887 3794 1106 0.334
Aurilia, Rich 960 3927 1085 0.329
Dahlen, Bill 578 1978 475 0.328
Fuller, Shorty 504 1880 446 0.326
Fletcher, Art 1240 4766 1311 0.318
Kerr, Buddy 820 2952 756 0.317
Clayton, Royce 499 1790 445 0.302
Uribe, Jose 969 2992 721 0.299
Pagan, Jose 613 2042 494 0.294
LeMaster, Johnnie 954 3089 695 0.280

Johnnie comes in last in this offensive category also…and finally how he does using RC27.

Best RC27 at SS
Player G AB H RC27
Glasscock, Jack 221 881 261 6.4
Bancroft, Dave 521 2160 670 6.1
Bridwell, Al 509 1698 480 5.3
Dark, Alvin 887 3794 1106 5.1
Aurilia, Rich 960 3927 1085 4.9
Fletcher, Art 1240 4766 1311 4.4
Fuller, Shorty 504 1880 446 4.2
Vizquel, Omar 445 1660 451 4.1
Kerr, Buddy 820 2952 756 3.8
Clayton, Royce 499 1790 445 3.4
Uribe, Jose 969 2992 721 3.1
Pagan, Jose 613 2042 494 2.9
LeMaster, Johnnie 954 3089 695 2.6

I removed Bill Dahlen from the calculation because he did not have all the necessary stats to calculate RC27. Maybe LeMaster wouldn’t be last in this category with Dahlen in the list but I’m pretty he would still be last.

As you can see LeMaster wasn’t in the lineup for his bat. Even Uribe finished at least 2 slots above LeMaster. It is nice to know even at the ages of 7 through 17 I could spot a bad SS! If LeMaster was this bad at the plate he must have been one helluva fielder. Sometime in the not too distant future I will do a similar post checking into his fielding stats.

As for the current Giant SS situation, even though it is far too early to say definitely that Bocock’s batting stats are LeMaster’sh it is surely starting to look that way. When and If he hits the 200 game
mark I will run the numbers to see.

Game #23: 1985 vs 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on April 25, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 23
  • ’85 Record: 8-15 .348
  • ’08 Record: 10-13 .435

There are four other teams with the same record 23 games into the season.

  • The ’65 team finished second with a record of 95-67 .586.
  • In ’67 the also finished second with a record of 91-71 .562 winning percentage.
  • The ’81 season was a strike year. The Giants ‘finished’ with a 56-55 for .505 winning percentage.
  • The ’00 Giants finished in first with a 97-65 record nearly winning 60% of their games, they had a .599 winning percentage. This team is the fourth best team since the Giants moved to San Francisco.

What a pitching duel the game was last night. Young had one more strikeout than Lincecum did with 10, two less walks then Lincecum with three, and only gave up 2 hits. Fortunately for us Giants fan
one of those hits was a homer. Young’s WHIP was .71, exactly half of Lincecum’s 1.42. Pitching like that and losing must hurt. One last note on the pitching last night. Both starters threw the same number of strikes with 74. Lincecum threw 122 pitches and Young threw 121. A nice pitching duel.

The Giants sweep the Padres to move into third place above a half a game over the Dodgers!

Game #22: 1985 vs 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on April 24, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 22
  • ’85 Record: 7-15 .318
  • ’08 Record: 9-13 .409

Other teams that had the 9-13 record at game 22 are:

  • ’77 Team which ended the season with a 75-87 for a winning percentage of .463. The finished fourth in the west.
  • ’79 Team ended the season with a 71-91 for a winning percentage of .438 and finished 4th in the west.
  • ’04 Team had a record of 91-71 0.562 winning percentage and finished second in the west.

After the late heroics last night the Giants have now pulled two games up on the ’85 team. Cain pitched great, only giving up one run but the lack of run production leaves him with a no decision. (Another strike against using Wins and Losses to determine the quality of a pitcher.) It would be nice if the team ended up like the ’04 team but that is not likely. They will probably be more like the ’77 team or worse.

Game #21 1985 vs. 2008

Posted in Team Comparison with tags on April 23, 2008 by statsdriven
  • Game #: 21
  • ’85 Record: 7-14 .333
  • ’08 Record: 8-13 .381

More of the same for the ’08 team. Zito doesn’t get the job done.

Zito the morning after

Posted in Players with tags on April 23, 2008 by statsdriven

I didn’t watch the game last night because I was watching the fantastic Sharks game 7. I did switch to the game when the Sharks were in between the 1st and 2nd periods just in time to see the Zito pitch to Webb. Shortly after the game winning hit by Webb I changed it back to the Sharks game. Given Zito’s game last night I thought I would look to see what Barry has done in the first five starts of the season going back to 2006.

Barry Zito’s first 5 starts of season ( 2006-2008 )
Season k/9 BB/9 IP/Start K/BB WHIP BA/OBP/SLG
2008 3.51 4.21 5.13 0.83 1.79 .321/.383/.509
2007 5.50 4.02 6.27 1.36 1.28 .305/.319/.624
2006 7.57 4.61 5.47 1.64 1.24 .211/.345/.400

Since 2006 his K/9 and K/BB are trending down while his WHIP is going up each season. The K/9 has fallen by 2 each of the last two seasons. His BB/K haven’t changed all that much but the number is still on the high side. These numbers do not bode well for the remainder of the season much less his contract. Perhaps Bochy should start thinking of him as a fourth or fifth starter instead of the ace.

What was Sabean thinking when he signed for seven years at 126 million?

Barry Zito on the Mound Tonight…

Posted in Players with tags on April 22, 2008 by statsdriven

…and more than likely another loss. I’ve checked how Zito did the last time he faced the Diamondbacks and found out it wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be but it still isn’t that good. The BA was only .238 but their OBP was .385 with a WHIP of 1.67 again not that great.

The losses can’t be totally put on Zito’s shoulders. The offense has only scored three runs in his four starts. He will be facing Brandon Web who is 4-0 and the last time he faced the Giants this season they only batted .111/.148/.172 and a WHIP of 0.63. So it looks like it will be another low scoring affair for the Giants at least. Hopefully Zito will lower his WHIP and BA and the batters can up their run support for him otherwise it looks like the Giants will be 8-13.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.